[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: The Right to Drive

In article <1145895467.000437.255570@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
 "proffsl" <proffsl@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Larry wrote:
> > proffsl wrote:
> >
> > > Larry, I know you initiated the beligerance between ourselves.
> >
> > Because you've deluded yourself.
> >
> > > And, regardless if you deny it, you also know you initiated the
> > > beligerance between ourselves.
> >
> > I don't know I did, because I didn't.
> 
> Provide a link to the evidence you aren't a bald face liar.

You made the claim - you prove it.

This is once again an amazing display of your debate and logical 
reasoning skills.  You make a claim, and someone disputes the claim.  
Then you think they need to bake up their position with proof, or ewlse 
your claim is valid.  Ha!

>  We've been
> through this routine before.  You refused to provide the evidence you
> weren't a liar then, and you'll more than likely refuse to provide the
> evidence you aren't a liar now.  Why?  Because the evidence doesn't
> exist, because you are a bald face liar.

You made the claim that I initiated the beligerance [sic].  You provide 
a link to the evidence that you're not a bald faced liar.  Oh, wait.  
You are a bald faced liar.


Home | Main Index | Thread Index 6479 11324 15396 23242 34209 35566 39921 48110 48331 48541

9/9/2010 9:51:07 GMT